In a recent incident that has sparked widespread condemnation, a middle school teacher in Texas was terminated for assigning an illustrated adaptation of the Diary of Anne Frank to her eighth-grade class. The move has ignited a debate about censorship, education, and the portrayal of sensitive topics in schools, with some likening it to authoritarian tactics.

The Hamshire-Fannett Independent School District (ISD) cited concerns over the use of an “unapproved and graphic version” of Anne Frank’s Diary by Ari Folman as the reason behind the teacher’s dismissal. This decision has drawn sharp criticism, with many asserting that it amounts to censorship and even accusations of antisemitism.

Censorship controversy unfolds

Qasim Rashid, a candidate for the US Congress in Illinois District 11, did not mince words when he labelled the incident as “horrific antisemitism.” He went on to say, “Censoring one of the most important works documenting the Holocaust and punishing the teacher who dared teach it is pretty much in line with what fascists do.”

The Anne Frank House in Amsterdam, a biographical museum dedicated to the Jewish wartime diarist, expressed disappointment in the actions taken by the school district against the teacher. A spokesperson from the museum stated, “Banning books, like the graphic adaptation of the #diary of #AnneFrank, because of certain passages is a missed opportunity to introduce young people to Anne Frank’s life story and the history of the #Holocaust.”

Debating the curriculum approval process

The controversy revolves around the use of a graphic novel version of “The Diary of Anne Frank” that the district claims was not approved for use in the classroom. According to KFDM, Mike Canizales, spokesperson for Hamshire-Fannett ISD, confirmed that the teacher was sent home and that an active investigation is underway. The district has since placed a substitute teacher in charge of the affected class.

Read: Texas fights to enact parts of controversial book rating law

In a letter to parents, the school district acknowledged the concerns raised, stating, “It was brought to the administration’s attention tonight that 8th grade students were reading content that was not appropriate. The reading of that content will cease immediately.”

Frank, a German-born Jewish teenager, penned her experiences while hiding from the Nazis in an attic in the Netherlands for over two years. Her diary, originally published in 1947, has been a vital part of Holocaust education for decades. However, it has also been a source of controversy in some public schools.

The controversy stems from passages in Frank’s unabridged diary where she wrote about topics like sexuality, which were omitted in earlier versions. The so-called explicit nature of these passages has led to debates about whether they are suitable for young readers.

The importance of transparent education

One key point of contention is the approval of the curriculum. While the district maintains that the adaptation of Anne Frank’s Diary was never approved, some parents argue that it was included in a reading list sent to them at the beginning of the school year. This has raised suspicions that someone higher up in the district may have been aware of the book’s inclusion.

Read: Top librarian fired by board as book ban compared with Nazi Germany

However, as explained by NBC News senior reporter Ben Collins, much of material has been taken out of context, and actually was in the original book before it was removed.

Amy Manuel, a parent in the Hamshire-Fannett ISD, expressed her concerns about the teacher’s approach, saying, “I mean it’s bad enough, she’s having them read this for an assignment, but then she also is making them read it aloud and making a little girl talk about feeling each other’s breasts and when she sees a female she goes into ecstasy, that’s not ok.”

As the investigation continues, questions surround the approval process for the curriculum, and allegations of censorship persist. The teacher involved has reportedly retained legal counsel, and the community awaits further developments in this ongoing saga. The incident serves as a reminder of the complex challenges surrounding the teaching of sensitive historical subjects and the need for transparent communication between educators, administrators, and parents.